The first one was my first thought. Though one is supposed to let it pass, some times one just can’t. I couldn’t convince myself-neither could I convince my art partner- still, I had wanted to proceed. And after arguing a bit, we decided to give it a nod of approval. But the nagging dissatisfaction deep within was just too adamant to be tamed. Ever since I came to know about Sophie Neveu and the various word games her uncle, the curator of Luvre, Jacques Sauniere taught her, I too indulge in some. It was how the idea came into existence. ‘Whater?’from water. And then it took a turn, a convincing one when I downplayed a couple of letters, unlike what I did in the first (adding ‘h’). And that’s how ‘WATER’ happened.
And if you think the second one is visually appealing (that’s what I think), then full credit must go to the ‘art moron’. He made it blazing by using ‘mushroom cloud’, the eternal nightmare of humanity.
5 comments:
I liked both the ideas - though of course the second one is instantly appealing with its visuals. Also, the idea of playing with words - it goes so well here.
I love the second one, not only because it is, like you pointed out, visually appealing, but also because of how relevant it is. War due to water seems very imminent.
:)
Madhuri: Thank You for the visit and comment. So you too agree with me that the second one is more convincing huh?
MB89: Yes, a war is imminent for the blue gold.
Even I liked both but the second one seems to be an appealing & clear way of conveying the idea.
Thank you Anjana
Post a Comment